National Motorists Association Blog


Fast Lanes For Better Drivers?

Posted on July 29th, 2010 in | 1 Comment »


By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist

Is anyone happy with the way our traffic system works?

We have what you might call a least common denominator, “one size fits all” licensing system that arguably serves no one well.

Example:

Drivers with experience and above-average skill (demonstrated by passing a more difficult driving test, or having successfully earned a certificate from a high-performance driving school such as Bondurant or Skip Barber, etc.) could probably be trusted to drive considerably faster than currently posted maximum lawful speeds of 70-75 mph (which is what speed limits were circa 1970) without endangering themselves or others.

In practice, of course, they already do.

But despite their ability to drive faster safely, they’re lumped in with the least competent via dumbed-down speed limits that put them in almost constant jeopardy of being radar-trapped into a $150 piece of payin’ paper.

On the flip side, marginal and outright incompetent drivers are not treated as such by the system. Jut the opposite. They are often rewarded — or at least, encouraged to think they are “good drivers” by dint of the fact that they don’t “speed.”

That they often tailgate, wander across the double yellow, blow through red lights — and so on — hardly seems to matter since for the most part, these offenses are not the focus of traffic safety enforcement. “Speeding” is the major no-no, even though driving faster than a number painted on a sign may have no bearing whatever on how safely (or not) you happen to be driving.

Since so little is expected of all drivers, the general level of skill is very low. This almost certainly makes it less safe out there than it ought to be — and easily could be.

But how to reconcile the good drivers with the bad ones — or at least, to not punish the good drivers just because they transgress against laws intended for the benefit of the not-so-good drivers?

A tiered system of licensing — with “fast lanes” on highways set aside for those who have passed more demanding proficiency requirements — could make driving safer and more pleasant for everyone. Such a system exists already in countries like Germany and the results have been hard to argue with: Germany enjoys a generally higher average skill level for its drivers (because getting a license over there is not an easy thing, as it is here) and an accident/fatality rate that is better than ours, despite often much faster rates of travel.

In a tiered system, there are two categories of driver’s license: The Basic and the Expert (with a Learner’s for teenaged/first-time drivers).

Read the rest of this article »


Fun With NHTSA Stats: The Safest/Most Dangerous Days To Drive

Posted on July 27th, 2010 in | 1 Comment »


The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has some interesting stats available to the public through their Fatality Analysis Reporting System.

One of the statistics they keep is the number of crashes on each day of the year. We decided it would be interesting to see which days had the most accidents and which days had the lowest number of crashes across the country.

Without further ado, here are the fifteen days with the most accidents on average from 1999-2008 (ten years):

Most Accidents

  1. January 1   132.1 average crashes
  2. July 4   131.5 average crashes
  3. July 3   126.3 average crashes
  4. August 3   123.3 average crashes
  5. September 2   122.7 average crashes
  6. September 1   120.9 average crashes
  7. August 6   120.8 average crashes
  8. September 22   120.6 average crashes
  9. July 2   120.4 average crashes
  10. October 14   119.7 average crashes
  11. August 4   119.6 average crashes
  12. August 31   119.5 average crashes
  13. June 30   119.2 average crashes
  14. July 15   118.4 average crashes
  15. August 11   118.3 average crashes

Read the rest of this article »


Is Your Old Car A Classic – Or Just A Used Car?

Posted on July 22nd, 2010 in , | No Comments »


By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist

Is that nicely preserved ’88 Buick in your garage a “classic ” — or just another old car?

The answer depends on who you ask.

Most states won’t issue a “classic” (or “antique”) vehicle license plate and registration until a vehicle is at least 21 years old. Some old car clubs (such as the Antique Automobile Club of America) consider the passage of 25-30 years the absolute minimum before a car transitions from being an old car to an antique.

The slightly snootier Classic Car Club of America goes even further. This group, which claims to have been the first to use the term “classic car,” refuses to acknowledge or accept any car built after the year 1948 — when mass-produced welded and stamped panels began to replace the more time-intensive, bolt-on/partial (or fully) hand-built processes that had been the norm previously.

CCCA regards only the coach-built cars of the 1920s and ’30s – V-16 Cadillacs, Bugattis, Auburns, Duesenbergs, Cords, etc. — as worthy, although an occasional exception is made for low-production, historically significant machines built later.

Read the rest of this article »


Columbus, Ohio: Innocent Or Not, You’re Paying Us

Posted on July 20th, 2010 in , | 5 Comments


If you’ve read any of our articles in the past, you know that red light ticket cameras have a way of helping city council members forget about basic due process rights.

This story from 10TV News in Ohio shows that Columbus, Ohio’s program is one of the worst in that respect:

According to Columbus policy, a driver has to pay $95 to have a hearing.  If the driver does not pay, he or she loses.  If he or she pays late, the payment rises to $120 and the driver could wind up at collections. [...]

10 Investigates wanted to know how often the policy catches innocent drivers and forces them to pay just to get a hearing.  We found plenty of cases.

In 2009, we found 60 cases.  There were 71 cases the previous year.  That is about 14 percent of the people who contest their tickets just are not guilty.

10 Investigates tracked down several of them and brought them to our studios.

“I feel like its highway robbery,” said Janice Henry, who was found not guilty.  “It’s just not fair.”

Dorothy Stills said that she had to use her child support credit card to prove that she was innocent.  She said that she had no other money.

“It’s totally unfair,” Stills said.  “It’s unfair to anyone, even if you’ve got a good paying job.”

This isn’t the end of the story. It actually gets worse:

Even more insulting, some drivers said, is what happens after you prove you’re innocent.  The city keeps your money for at least 60 to 90 days, Aker reported.

“I think the City of Columbus should be ashamed of itself,” said Joshua Dressler, a nationally renowned law professor, who has authored volumes of articles and textbooks on criminal law.

According to Dressler, the system violates a fundamental concept of American justice.

“This system turns everything on its head,” Dressler said.  “It basically requires a citizen to prove himself or herself innocent of the infraction and requires them to effectively pay the penalty just to get themselves into court.”

Read the rest of this article »





Free Weekly Email Newsletter

Enter your email address below and click subscribe.


© National Motorists Association